Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information on Career Management, 4e

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Career Assessment
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gati, I.
Right arrow Articles by Fassa, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Scale Structure of Multi-Scale Measures: Application of the Split-Scale Method to the Task- Specific Occupational Self-Efficacy Scale and the Career Decision-Making Self-Efficacy Scale

Itamar Gati

Hebrew University of Jerusalem

Samuel H. Osipow

The Ohio State University

Naomi Fassa

Hebrew University of Jerusalem

The present study evaluated the internal structure of two translated multiple-scale questionnaires: the Task-Specific Occupational Self-Efficacy Scale (TSOSS; Osipow, Temple, & Rooney, 1993) and the Career Decision-Making Self-Efficacy Scale (CDMSE; Taylor & Betz, 1983). Data were obtained during a pilot study for testing the Hebrew versions of the TSOSS and the CDMSE. Cluster analysis applied to the split scales was found to complement the traditional method used to assess the psychometric properties of the instruments. As proposed by its authors, the TSOSS was found to possess four distinct scales in both language versions. The elimination of problematic items from the Hebrew version revealed the five hypothesized factors assumed to underlie the CDMSE. The proposed clustering analysis of the split scales appears to have potential application to the refinement process of other multi-scale instruments as well.

Journal of Career Assessment, Vol. 2, No. 4, 384-397 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/106907279400200405


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Career DevelopmentHome page
N. Z. Hampton
A Psychometric Evaluation of the Career Decision Self-Efficacy Scale-Short Form in Chinese High School Students
Journal of Career Development, December 1, 2006; 33(2): 142 - 155.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Career AssessmentHome page
N. Z. Hampton
Testing for the Structure of the Career Decision Self-Efficacy Scale-Short Form Among Chinese College Students
Journal of Career Assessment, February 1, 2005; 13(1): 98 - 113.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
J. E. Nilsson, C. K. Schmidt, and W. D. Meek
Reliability Generalization: An Examination of the Career Decision-Making Self-Efficacy Scale
Educational and Psychological Measurement, August 1, 2002; 62(4): 647 - 658.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Career AssessmentHome page
P. A. Creed, W. Patton, and M. B. Watson
Cross-Cultural Equivalence of the Career Decision-Making Self-Efficacy Scale-Short Form: An Australian and South African Comparison
Journal of Career Assessment, August 1, 2002; 10(3): 327 - 342.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Career AssessmentHome page
N. Betz, R. Schifano, and A. Kaplan
Relationships Among Measures of Perceived Self-Efficacy With Respect to Basic Domains of Vocational Activity
Journal of Career Assessment, July 1, 1999; 7(3): 213 - 226.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Career AssessmentHome page
S. H. Osipow and I. Gati
Construct and Concurrent Validity of the Career Decision-Making Difficulties Questionnaire
Journal of Career Assessment, June 1, 1998; 6(3): 347 - 364.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of Career AssessmentHome page
N. E. Betz and D. A. Luzzo
Career Assessment and the Career Decision-Making Self-Efficacy Scale
Journal of Career Assessment, September 1, 1996; 4(4): 413 - 428.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of Career AssessmentHome page
S. H. Osipow and R. D. Temple
Development and Use of the Task-Specific Occupational Self-Efficacy Scale
Journal of Career Assessment, September 1, 1996; 4(4): 445 - 456.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of Career AssessmentHome page
N. E. Betz, K. L. Klein, and K. M. Taylor
Evaluation of a Short Form of the Career Decision-Making Self-Efficacy Scale
Journal of Career Assessment, July 1, 1996; 4(1): 47 - 57.
[Abstract]