Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information on Career Management, 4e

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Career Assessment
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Williams, T. W.
Right arrow Articles by Betz, N. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Relationships Among Occupational and Task-Specific Measures of Career Self-Efficacy

Theodore W. Williams

The Ohio State University

Nancy E. Betz

The Ohio State University

The Short Form of the Task-Specific Occupational Self-Efficacy Scale (TSOSS; Osipow, Temple, & Rooney, 1993) and a measure of self-efficacy with respect to 20 occupational titles (Occupational Self-Efficacy Scale [OSES; Betz & Hackett, 1981]) were administered to 111 male and 159 female college students. Results indicated significant gender and order of administration effects for both task- specific and occupational self-efficacy, with higher scores found among males and when the OSES, versus the TSOSS, was administered first. Relationships between task-specific and occupational self-efficacy were moderate in size, and TSOSS factor score intercorrelations were significantly stronger in females than males.

Journal of Career Assessment, Vol. 2, No. 4, 341-351 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/106907279400200402
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Journal of Career AssessmentHome page
N. E. Betz
Self-Efficacy Theory as a Basis for Career Assessment
Journal of Career Assessment, July 1, 2000; 8(3): 205 - 222.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Career AssessmentHome page
K. R. Kelly and R. C. Nelson
Task-Specific Occupational Self-Efficacy Scale: A Predictive Validity Study
Journal of Career Assessment, October 1, 1999; 7(4): 381 - 392.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Career AssessmentHome page
N. Betz, R. Schifano, and A. Kaplan
Relationships Among Measures of Perceived Self-Efficacy With Respect to Basic Domains of Vocational Activity
Journal of Career Assessment, July 1, 1999; 7(3): 213 - 226.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Career AssessmentHome page
N. E. Betz and G. Hackett
Applications of Self-Efficacy Theory to the Career Assessment of Women
Journal of Career Assessment, September 1, 1997; 5(4): 383 - 402.
[Abstract]