This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (12) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Betz, N. E. Articles by Multon, K. D. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Reliability and Validity of Five-Level Response Continua for the Career Decision Self-Efficacy Scale

The Ohio State University, betz{at}osu.edu

Marie S. Hammond

Tennessee State University

Karen D. Multon

University of Kansas

The present study, based on three samples of college students totaling 1,832 participants, resulted in the conclusion that a 5-level response continuum for the short form of the Career Decision Self-Efficacy Scale (CDSE)¹ proved at least as reliable and valid as the 10-level continua used in normative studies. Values of coefficient alpha ranged from .78 to .87 for the 5-level continuum, in contrast to .69 to .83 for the 10-level continuum. Criterion-related validity correlations with career indecision and vocational identity were comparable for the two response continua. Validity with respect to the scales of the Career Decision Profile was examined, as was construct validity with respect to measures of hope, goal stability, and positive and negative affect. Overall, the study suggests the psychometric quality of the CDSE when 5-level response continua are used and adds to knowledge of the nomological network of the construct.¹

Key Words: career self-efficacy • career decision self-efficacy • career decision making • Bandura’s theory • career counseling

Journal of Career Assessment, Vol. 13, No. 2, 131-149 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/1069072704273123


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. H. Lease and D. T. Dahlbeck Parental Influences, Career Decision-Making Attributions, and Self-Efficacy: Differences for Men and Women? Journal of Career Development, December 1, 2009; 36(2): 95 - 113. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N. Fouad, E. W. Cotter, and N. Kantamneni The Effectiveness of a Career Decision-Making Course Journal of Career Assessment, August 1, 2009; 17(3): 338 - 347. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. L. Grier-Reed, N. R. Skaar, and J. L. Conkel-Ziebell Constructivist Career Development as a Paradigm of Empowerment for At-Risk Culturally Diverse College Students Journal of Career Development, March 1, 2009; 35(3): 290 - 305. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. J. Dik, A. M. Sargent, and M. F. Steger Career Development Strivings: Assessing Goals and Motivation in Career Decision-Making and Planning Journal of Career Development, September 1, 2008; 35(1): 23 - 41. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N. E. Betz Career Self-Efficacy: Exemplary Recent Research and Emerging Directions Journal of Career Assessment, November 1, 2007; 15(4): 403 - 422. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. O. Hartman and N. E. Betz The Five-Factor Model and Career Self-Efficacy: General and Domain-Specific Relationships Journal of Career Assessment, May 1, 2007; 15(2): 145 - 161. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Chaney, M. S. Hammond, N. E. Betz, and K. D. Multon The Reliability and Factor Structure of the Career Decision Self-Efficacy Scale-SF With African Americans Journal of Career Assessment, May 1, 2007; 15(2): 194 - 205. [Abstract] [PDF]